A Simple and Reproducible Machine Learning Pipeline for Parkinson’s Disease Detection Using Smartwatch-Based Inertial Signals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21015/vtse.v14i1.2373

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by motor symptoms such as tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. Wearable inertial sensors enable non-invasive and cost-effective assessment of motor abnormalities in real-world settings. Despite recent advances in deep learning, many existing approaches rely on complex architectures with limited interpretability and inconsistent evaluation protocols. This study proposes a simple and reproducible classical machine learning pipeline for PD detection using smartwatch-based inertial signals from the PADS dataset. Spectral and statistical features were extracted from accelerometer and gyroscope signals, and LASSObased feature selection was applied within a nested subject-level cross-validation framework to prevent data leakage. Several classifiers, including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, CatBoost, and Multi-Layer Perceptron, were evaluated. The proposed pipeline achieved 79.26% balanced accuracy, 87.32% accuracy, and an F1-score of 0.92 for PD vs. healthy control classification, while 67.15% balanced accuracy was obtained for the more challenging PD vs. differential diagnosis task. Feature analysis showed that PD vs. healthy control discrimination is dominated by tremor-related spectral and amplitude features, whereas variability-related features are more relevant for differential diagnosis. These results demonstrate that competitive performance can be achieved using a simple and interpretable pipeline, providing a practical alternative to more complex deep learning approaches.

References

K. R. Chaudhuri, D. G. Healy, and A. H. V. Schapira, “Nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: Diagnosis and management,” *Lancet Neurology*, vol. 5, pp. 235–245, 2006.

C. H. Hawkes, K. Del Tredici, and H. Braak, “A timeline for Parkinson’s disease,” *Parkinsonism and Related Disorders*, vol. 16, pp. 79–84, 2010.

L. Lonini et al., “Wearable sensors for Parkinson’s disease: Which data are worth collecting for training symptom detection models,” *npj Digital Medicine*, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 64, 2018.

M. H. G. Monje, G. Foffani, J. Obeso, and A. Sanchez-Ferro, “New sensor and wearable technologies to aid in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of Parkinson’s disease,” *Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering*, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 111–143, 2019.

E. Rovini, G. Maremmani, and F. Cavallo, “How wearable sensors can support Parkinson’s disease diagnosis and treatment: A systematic review,” *Frontiers in Neuroscience*, vol. 11, Art. 555, 2017.

J. Varghese et al., “Sensor validation and diagnostic potential of smartwatches in movement disorders,” *Sensors*, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 3139, 2021.

R. San-Segundo et al., “Parkinson’s disease tremor detection in the wild using wearable accelerometers,” *Sensors*, vol. 20, no. 20, p. 5817, 2020.

M. Keba, J. Helmich, G. P. Schifino, and W. Maetzler, “Assessing Parkinson’s rest tremor from the wrist with inertial sensors: Validity against clinical ratings and implications for monitoring,” *Journal of Clinical Medicine*, vol. 14, no. 6, Art. 2073, 2025.

G. P. Schifino, M. Keba, J. Helmich, and W. Maetzler, “Smartwatch sensors for tremor assessment in Parkinson’s disease: Development and validation of a wrist-worn algorithm,” *Sensors*, vol. 25, no. 14, Art. 4313, 2025.

F. Lin et al., “Hand movement recognition and salient tremor feature extraction with wearable devices in Parkinson’s patients,” *IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems*, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 284–295, 2023.

L. Battista and A. Romaniello, “A wearable tool for continuous monitoring of movement disorders: Clinical assessment and comparison with tremor scores,” *Neurological Sciences*, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 4241–4248, 2021.

J. Varghese et al., “PADS: Parkinson’s Disease Smartwatch Dataset (version 1.0.0),” *PhysioNet*, 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://physionet.org/content/pads/1.0.0/](https://physionet.org/content/pads/1.0.0/). DOI: 10.13026/m0w9-zx22

L. Sigcha et al., “Automatic resting tremor assessment in Parkinson’s disease using smartwatches and multitask convolutional neural networks,” *Sensors*, vol. 21, p. 291, 2021.

A. Papadopoulos et al., “Detecting parkinsonian tremor from IMU data collected in-the-wild using deep multiple-instance learning,” *IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics*, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2559–2569, 2020.

L. Sigcha et al., “Deep learning and wearable sensors for the diagnosis and monitoring of Parkinson’s disease: Systematic review,” *Expert Systems with Applications*, vol. 229, part A, Art. 120541, 2023.

Y. K. Meng, T. Liang, H. Liu, and X. Wang, “Improved deep learning for Parkinson’s diagnosis based on wearable sensors,” *Electronics*, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 4638, 2024.

M. Wang et al., “Parkinson’s disease detection using multi-scale frequency-sharing channel attention network with smartwatch movement recordings,” *IEEE Internet of Things Journal*, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 14567–14577, 2025.

S. Del Din, A. Godfrey, C. Mazza, S. Lord, and L. Rochester, “Free-living monitoring of Parkinson’s disease: Lessons from the field,” *Movement Disorders*, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1293–1313, 2016.

S. Del Din, A. Godfrey, and L. Rochester, “Validation of an accelerometer to quantify a comprehensive battery of gait characteristics in healthy older adults and Parkinson’s disease: Toward clinical and at home use,” *IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics*, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 838–847, 2016.

J. Varghese et al., “Machine learning in the Parkinson’s disease smartwatch (PADS) dataset,” *npj Parkinson’s Disease*, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 9, 2024.

A. Sanchez-Ferro et al., “Wearable sensor-based assessments for remotely screening early-stage Parkinson’s disease,” *Sensors*, vol. 24, no. 18, Art. 5637, 2024.

Y. Zhang et al., “Wearable inertial sensor-based Parkinson’s disease detection using hybrid feature learning and machine learning,” *Sensors*, vol. 25, no. 4, Art. 4924, 2025.

M. P. Burns et al., “Wearable sensor-based assessment of Parkinson’s disease using BioStampRC21 dataset: Challenges in generalization,” *Bioengineering*, vol. 12, no. 1, Art. 37, 2024.

J. Lipsmeier et al., “Evaluation of smartphone-based testing to generate exploratory outcome measures in Parkinson’s disease,” *npj Parkinson’s Disease*, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. 953, 2025.

S. Zhan et al., “Digital biomarker validation for Parkinson’s disease using wearable sensors in real-world settings,” *npj Parkinson’s Disease*, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. 1214, 2025.

S. Rahu, G. Ali, S. Tahseen, A. K. Baloch, and A. R. Baloch, “2DCNN_CLA: Accurate prediction of Clathrin proteins using hyperparameter optimization in deep learning and DDE profiles,” *VAWKUM Transactions on Computer Sciences*, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 163–179, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Vu, Q., Nguyen, M.-C., Tran, D.-T., & Solanki, V. K. (2026). A Simple and Reproducible Machine Learning Pipeline for Parkinson’s Disease Detection Using Smartwatch-Based Inertial Signals. VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(1), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtse.v14i1.2373