Integrating COBIT 2019 with Zero Trust Architecture: A Strategic Approach to GRC in Cybersecurity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21015/vtse.v13i4.2245

Abstract

This paper is the first to show a shared security governance model that combines COBIT 2019 for strategic oversight and ZTA for tactical, real-time enforcement. This model addresses the poor performance of traditional GRC and perimeter security that cannot handle distributed clouds and sophisticated insider attacks. We posit that the objective of COBIT strong governance could be operationalized with ZTA’s “never trust, always verify” principles. The present study illustrates the integration by linking COBIT’s process domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA) to the core ZTA pillars (Identities, Devices, Networks, Applications, Data). This mapping provides confirmation that ZTA is a practical mechanism for control assurance that enables organizations to take a strong, risk-sensitive, and compliant posture within a changing digital environment.

References

E. Ponick and G. Wieczorek, Artificial Intelligence in Governance, Risk and Compliance. Lippstadt, Germany: Hochschule Hamm-Lippstadt, 2021.

E. W. Tomlinson, W. D. Abrha, S. D. Kim, and S. A. Ortega, “Cybersecurity access control: Framework analysis in a healthcare institution,” J. Cybersecur. Priv., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 762–776, 2024.

L. Huang and Q. Zhu, “ZETAR: Modeling and computational design of strategic and adaptive compliance policies,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Social Syst., 2023.

S. Sarkar, G. Choudhary, S. K. Shandilya, A. Hussain, and H. Kim, “Security of zero trust networks in cloud computing: A comparative review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 18, p. 11213, 2022.

ISACA, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. Schaumburg, IL, USA: ISACA, 2018.

T. Bashir, “Zero trust architecture: Enhancing cybersecurity in enterprise networks,” J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Stud., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 54–59, 2024.

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Zero Trust Maturity Model, Version 2.0. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Dept. Homeland Security, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/zero_trust_maturity_model_v2_508.pdf

S. Rose, O. Borchert, S. Mitchell, and S. Connelly, Zero Trust Architecture, NIST SP 800-207. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2020.

M. Hasan, “Enhancing enterprise security with zero trust architecture: Mitigating vulnerabilities and insider threats through continuous verification and least privilege access,” unpublished manuscript, Dept. Cybersecurity, ECPI University, 2024.

D. Ajish, “The significance of artificial intelligence in zero trust technologies: A comprehensive review,” J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 11, no. 30, 2024.

M. Sánchez-García, J. López, R. Fernández, and S. Kim, “A comprehensive study on zero trust architecture for enterprise cybersecurity,” Int. J. Inf. Secur., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 101–120, 2024.

A. Busch and B. Zalewski, “Advancements in zero trust security: Integrating governance, risk, and compliance frameworks,” J. Cybersecurity Inf. Technol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 145–162, 2025.

ISACA, COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. Schaumburg, IL, USA: ISACA, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Hussain, M. H., Riaz , A., & Butt, A. (2025). Integrating COBIT 2019 with Zero Trust Architecture: A Strategic Approach to GRC in Cybersecurity. VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(4), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtse.v13i4.2245