Ecocritical Reading of Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra

Sajid Hussain, Dr. Barirah Nazir, Raheel Rehman Khan, Abdul Rashid

Abstract


The present study is aimed to trace out the relationship of nature and man in the play Antony and Cleopatra by William Shakespeare. The major theoretical insights have been taken from the model of Ecocriticism proposed by Rueckert (2006) in his seminal work Metaphor and Reality: A Meditation on Man, Nature and Words. The ecocritical discourse analysis of the play, Antony and Cleopatra, reveals that there is proximal relationship between nature and human culture. Both human and nature remain interactive consistently. The ecocritical survey of Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra concludes that each human character plays complete set of roles, either ecocidal or eco-affable depending upon the intensity of their eco-awareness. It can concluded that Nature has brightness and joy which happen to be essential elements blossom and revive in due course making possible the improvement and delighted restoration.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bower Bank, S. (2004). Speaking for nature: Women and ecologies of early modern England. JHU Press.

Danby, J. F. (1957). Shakespeare's Doctrine of Nature. A Study of" King Lear." 1948. Spenser Th.

Egan, G. (2006). Green Shakespeare: From ecopolitics to ecocriticism. Routledge.

Estok, S. C. (2009). Theorizing in a space of ambivalent openness: Ecocriticism and ecophobia. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 16(2), 203-225.

Evans, R. (2018). Hamlet by William Shakespeare, and: Saint Joan by George Bernard Shaw. Theatre

Journal, 70(1), 92-94.

Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism. Routledge.

Gillies, J. (1994). Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference (Vol. 4). Cambridge University

Press.

Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. University of Georgia Press.

Hiltner, K. (2011). What Else Is Pastoral?. In What Else Is Pastoral?. Cornell University Press.

Parham, J. (2017). The environmental tradition in English literature. Routledge.

Marland, P. (2013). Ecocriticism. Literature Compass, 10(11), 846-868.

McColley, D. (2002). The Commodious Ark: Nature's Voice in Early Modern Poetry. The Environmental Tradition in English Literature, 130-43.

Raber, K. (2015). Shakespeare and Animal Studies. Literature Compass, 12(6), 286-298.

Rueckert, W. H. (2006). Metaphor and Reality: A Meditation on Man, Nature and Words. KB Journal, 2(2).

Schweninger, L. (1993). Writing Nature: Silko and Native Americans as Nature Writers. Melus, 18(2), 47-60.

Watson, R. N. (2003). As You Liken It: Simile in the Wilderness. Shakespeare Survey, 79-92.

Primary Source

Shakespeare, W., & Harley, I. (2005). Antony and Cleopatra. Faber & Gwyer.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v10i2.979

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.