Conversation Analysis of English Language Classroom Interaction at Public Schools in Punjab, Pakistan

Afsheen Nusrat, Nabila Akbar, Aamir Aziz

Abstract


This Conversation Analysis (CA) study proposes to investigate the Initiation Response Feedback  (IRF),  forms in teacher fronted interaction, to investigate, the amount of teacher talk, teacher–learner interaction including, nature of initiation patterns, at middle level ESL classroom of public schools. All data, used in the study comes from transcription of the audio recordings to elicit the real classroom language. Conversation Analysis (CA) is adopted as the diagnostic approach to identify earlier mentioned features of classroom conversation. Data was recorded by the means of audio recorder and opportunity sampling was done for collecting data. The analysis is done by keeping the research focus in mind that is, identification of real classroom interaction. The findings of this study concludes that public sector classrooms offer very less scope to communication approach of learning as a result students remain unexposed to real life language use and remained stuck on rules of language rather use of language. Finding of the research also displayed that though, the EFL classrooms offer vast room for communication and interactional practices however, it is utilized inappropriately in public schools.


 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Angelo, T. A. (1993). A" Teacher's dozen. AAHE Bulletin, 45(8), 3-7.

Aziz, A., Mahmood, M.A., Ahmad, S., & Akbar, N. (2021). A corpus-based study of genre-specific discourse: M.A. TEFL thesis abstracts. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(Special Issue 2), 884-898.

Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press. De Bot, Kees. "Interaction in the classroom." Tesol Quarterly 35.4 (2001): 602-603.

Enfield, N. J. (2007). Meanings of the unmarked: How'default'person reference does more than just refer. In Person reference in Interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 97-120). Cambridge University Press.

Gündüz, M. (2014). Analysing language classrooms through classroom interaction. Journal of human sciences, 11(2), 1149- 1166. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Polity.

Mansoor, S. (2005). Language planning in higher education: A case study of Pakistan. Oxford University Press, USA.

Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4),491-500.

Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at cross-purposes?. Applied linguistics,17(3), 286-325.

Naveed, M. S., Sarim, M., & Ahsan, K. (2015). On the Felicitous Applications of Natural Language. Science International, 27(23), 2643-2646.

Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1988). Variations in classroom interaction as a function of participation pattern and task. Second language discourse: A textbook of current research, 4155.

Ramzan, M., Aziz, A., & Ghaffar, M. (2021). A study of code-mixing and code-switching (Urdu and Punjabi) in children’s early speech. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 869-881. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.60

Rivers, W. M. (1987). Interactive language teaching. Cambridge University Press, 40 West 20th Street, New York,

NY 10011 (hardcover--ISBN-0-521-32216-2; paperback--ISBN-0-521-31108-X).

Seedhouse, P. (1996). Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities. Elt Journal, 50(1), 16-24

Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Oxford:Blackwell.

Seedhouse, P. (2005). “Task” as research construct. Language learning, 55(3), 533-570.

Seedhouse, P. (2011). Conversation analytic research into language teaching and learning. The handbook of research in second language teachings teaching and learning, 2(1).

Shamim, F. (2011). English as the language for development in Pakistan: Issues, challenges and possible solutions. Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language, 291-310.

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis. Sociolinguistics and language education, 492

Sidnell, J., & Enfield, N. J. (2012). Language diversity and social action: A third locus of linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 302-333.

Sinclair, J. M., Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press, USA

Skuse, G. E. (2012). A conversation analysis approach to interaction within an english as a foreign language (efl) class information gap task.

Ten Have, P. (2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage

Van Lier, L. (2001). The role of form in language learning. Eds. M. Bax and J. Zwart. Reflections on language and language learning: In honor of Arthur van Essen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 253-266.

Van Lier, L. (2002). A tale of two computer classrooms. Ecology of language acquisition, 49-63.

Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers: Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v10i2.923

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.