Nonparametric test for multiple crossing Survival Curves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21015/vtm.v12i1.1839Abstract
Log-rank, Wilcoxon and Tarone-Ware tests are most commonly used tests for testing the overall homogeneity of survival curves, but in certain situation it appears that they have a significant loss of statistical testing power. One such case is the more than one time crossing of survival curves. The problem considered often occurs in medical research. To overcome this problem, in this article, we present and study a non-parametric test procedure based on a new weight. The proposed new weighted test has greater power to detect overall differences between more than one time crossing survival curves. Simulation studies are performed to compare the proposed method with existing methods. Furthermore, the advantage of the new test is finally exemplified in the analysis of a β-thalassaemia major data.
References
Csalódi, R., Bagyura, Z., Vathy-Fogarassy, Á., & Abonyi, J. (2024). Time-dependent frequent sequence mining-based survival analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 296, 111885.
Li, X., Marcus, D., Russell, J., Aboagye, E. O., Ellis, L. B., Sheeka, A., ... & Rockall, A. G. (2024). Weibull parametric model for survival analysis in women with endometrial cancer using clinical and T2-weighted MRI radiomic features. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24(1), 107.
Srujana, B., Verma, D., & Naqvi, S. (2024). Machine learning vs. survival analysis models: a study on right censored heart failure data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 53(4), 1899-1916.
Wang, P., Li, Y., & Reddy, C. K. (2019). Machine learning for survival analysis: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(6), 1-36.
Mantel, N. (1966). Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep, 50(3), 163-170.
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972). Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 135(2), 185-198.
Gehan, E. A. (1965). A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika, 52(1-2), 203-224.
Gehan, E. A. (1965). A generalized two-sample Wilcoxon test for doubly censored data. Biometrika, 52(3/4), 650-653.
Tarone, R. E., & Ware, J. (1977). On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika, 64(1), 156-160.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2004). The log-rank test. Bmj, 328(7447), 1073.
Fleming, T. R., O’Fallon, J. R., O’Brien, P. C., & Harrington, D. P. (1980). Modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov test procedures with application to arbitrarily right-censored data. Biometrics, 607-625.
SPOSTO, R., STABLEIN, D., & CARTER-CAMPBELL, S. H. E. L. L. Y. (1997). A partially grouped logrank test. Statistics in medicine, 16(6), 695-704.
You, N., He, X., Dai, H., & Wang, X. (2023). Ball divergence for the equality test of crossing survival curves. Statistics in medicine, 42(29), 5353-5368.
Collett, D. (1994). Modelling survival data. In Modelling survival data in medical research (pp. 53-106). Springer US.
Muse, A. H., Chesneau, C., Ngesa, O., & Mwalili, S. (2022). Flexible parametric accelerated hazard model: Simulation and application to censored lifetime data with crossing survival curves. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 27(6), 104.
Fernández, T., Gretton, A., Rindt, D., & Sejdinovic, D. (2023). A kernel log-rank test of independence for right censored data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 118(542), 925-936.
Dormuth, I., Liu, T., Xu, J., Pauly, M., & Ditzhaus, M. (2023). A comparative study to alternatives to the log-rank test. Contemporary clinical trials, 128, 107165.
Brookmeyer, R., & Curriero, F. C. (2002). Survival curve estimation with partial non-random exposure information. Statistics in medicine, 21(18), 2671-2683.
Adebayo, S. B., & Fahrmeir, L. (2005). Analysing child mortality in Nigeria with geoadditive discretetime survival models. Statistics in medicine, 24(5), 709-728.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY