Enhancing Confidence in Students’ English Speaking Skills by the Use of Interactive Practices

Dr. Afsheen Salahuddin, Dr. Farah Deeba, Amna Saleem


In a developing country like Pakistan, speaking English has emerged as the most popular tool for communication. Fluent speakers of English get good job opportunities as this is also the need of the hour. The English language has become an international language widely spoken all over the world. For the present study, the problem identified by the researchers was the low confidence level of students in spoken English. Therefore, the core purpose of the current endeavor was to enhance the confidence of students in speaking English by using interactive practices. The present study was conducted at one of the private sector universities in Lahore, Pakistan. The quasi-experiment and pre-and post-test research designs were used in the study. An intact group consisting of 40 students from the university was included in the study. Furthermore, these 40 students were divided into two groups, i.e., the experimental group and the control group. The traditional teaching method utilized in the English language lessons was replaced by innovative and interactive sessions for one semester for the experimental group. The null hypothesis developed was: there was no change in the confidence level of students in speaking English before and after the intervention. The data was statistically analyzed, and it was discovered that interactive activities can boost students' confidence and reduce anxiety while promoting an urge in them to speak up without hesitation. Thus, it is proposed that interactive activities be used in the English language classroom to boost students’ speaking skills in English.

Full Text:



Abdalla, M. E., & Elhadi, E. N. (2015). Problems of teaching and learning spoken English in Sudan. Journal of Science and Technology, 16(4), 43-53.

Ahmad, N. (2011). Analysing the Spoken English Needs in Pakistani Academic Legal Settings. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 31(2), 449-469.

Ahmed, N., Pathan, Z. H., & Khan, F. S. (2017). Exploring the causes of English language speaking anxiety among postgraduate students of university of Balochistan, Pakistan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 99-105.

Batlle, J., & Deal, M. (2021). Teacher epistemic stance as a trouble in foreign language classroom interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 15-25.

Beasley, S. T. (2021). Student–faculty interactions and psycho- socio cultural influences as predictors of engagement among Black college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(2), 240.

Burdelski, M. J., & Howard, K. M. (Eds.). (2020). Language socialization in classrooms: Culture, interaction, and language development. Cambridge University Press.

Chang, A. C. S. (2008). Sources of listening anxiety in learning English as a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(1), 21-34.

Coskun, A. (2013). Native Speakers as Teachers in Turkey: Non-Native Pre-Service English Teachers' Reactions to a Nation-Wide Project. Qualitative Report, 18, 57.

Esmail, A., Ahmed, M., & Noreen, S. (2015). Why do Pakistani students are reluctant to speak English. Academic Research International, 6(3), 372-383.

Frost, J. (2015). Choosing between a nonparametric test and a parametric test. State College: The Minitab Blog.

Grimshaw, J., Campbell, M., Eccles, M., & Steen, N. (2000). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. Family practice, 17(suppl_1), S11-S16.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.

Haidara, Y. (2016). Psychological Factor Affecting English Speaking Performance for the English Learners in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1501-1505.

Jamila, M. (2014). Lack of Confidence--A Psychological Factor Affecting Spoken English of University Level Adult Learners in Bangladesh. Language in India, 14(10),171-183.

Jia, X. (2013, June). The application of classroom interaction in English lesson. In 2013 the International Conference on Education Technology and Information System (ICETIS 2013). Atlantis Press.

Kohnke, L. (2021). GoSoapBox–Encourage participation and interaction in the language classroom. RELC Journal, 52(3), 648-650.

Littlewood, W., Liu, N. F., & Yu, C. (1996). Hong Kong tertiary students' attitudes and proficiency in spoken English. RELC journal, 27(1), 70-88.

Lochtman, K. (2002). Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 271-283.

Meylina, M. (2017). Challenges of learning spoken English in Minangkabau context. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 5, 86-96.

Mertens, D. M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.

Omar, S. F., Nawi, H. S. A., Shahdan, T. S. T., Mee, R. W. M., Pek, L. S., & Yob, F. S. C. (2020). Interactive Language Learning Activities for Learners' Communicative Ability. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1010-1016.

Seidlhofer, B. (1996). It is an undulating feeling...’: The importance of being a non-native teacher of English. VIEWS (Vianna English Working Papers), 5, 63-79.

Smit, N., van Dijk, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (2021). The complex dynamics of adaptive teaching: observing teacher-student interaction in the language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.

Some-Guiebre, E. (2020). Foreign Language Classroom Interaction: Does It Promote Communicative Skills?. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 497-505.

Spitzberg, B. H., & Adams, T. W. (2007). CSRS, the conversational skills rating scale: an instructional assessment of interpersonal competence. NCA, National Communication Association.

Suleimenova, Z. (2013). Speaking anxiety in a foreign language classroom in Kazakhstan. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 93, 1860-1868.

Thompson, C. B., & Panacek, E. A. (2006). Research study designs: experimental and quasi-experimental. Air medical journal, 25(6), 242-246.

Veit, A., Alldrin, N., Chechik, G., Krasin, I., Gupta, A., & Belongie, S. (2017). Learning from noisy large-scale datasets with minimal supervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 839-847).

Wei, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2002). Insights into English Pronunciation Problems of Thai Students.

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Quadruple

Helix (8th, April 6, 2002). Eric Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.

White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-experimental design and methods. Methodological briefs: impact evaluation, 8(2014), 1-16.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v10i1.957


  • There are currently no refbacks.