Cross-Border Fire and Fragile Ceasefires: Pakistan-Afghanistan Relations in 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v13i4.2288Abstract
The year 2025 has seen a recurrence of border clashes between Pakistan and Afghanistan, demonstrating very clearly the deep-seated mistrust, securitized narratives, and fragile ceasefires that keep regional stability tenuous. This study, "Cross-Border Fire and Fragile Ceasefires: Pakistan-Afghanistan Relations in 2025," adopts a qualitative descriptive approach in analyzing the political, security, and discursive dimensions of the border conflict. The research applies the Securitization Theory and Realist perspective using government statements, media coverage, international reports, and policy documents to interpret how security threats are constructed by the two states and exceptional measures justified. Results indicate that though diplomatic engagements have been made, Islamabad and Kabul remain firmly set within a mutual security dilemma in which threat perceptions override cooperation. Non-state actors, particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan and the Islamic State Khorasan Province, exploit border instability by intensifying violence and weakening state control. Media narratives further polarize attitudes and portray the conflict in a more nationalist and defensive tone. This paper concludes that the cross-border violence in 2025 is less a product of isolated incidents and more of an expression of rival sovereignty claims, fragile governance, and regional power contestation. Furthermore, this paper suggests that transforming the Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier from a site of confrontation to a space for cooperation and mutual security would require the joint institutionalization of border management, counterterrorism frameworks, and confidence-building measures.
References
Al Jazeera. (2025, October 15). Border clashes displace hundreds along Pakistan–Afghanistan frontier. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/15/pakistan-afghanistan-border-clashes
Ali, M., & Yawar, M. Y. (2025, October 13). Pakistani troops on high alert on Afghan border after fighting, trade halts. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/pakistani-troops-high-alert-afghan-border-after-fighting-trade-halts-2025-10-13
Azam, M. (2024). Durand line conundrum, territorial claims, and border politics. Pakistan Horizon. https://www.pakistan-horizon.piia.org.pk/index.php/pakistan-horizon/article/download/379/313/388
Balzacq, T. (2011). Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve. Routledge.
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Government of Pakistan. (2025). Press briefing on border security and diplomatic engagement with Afghanistan.
Grare, F. (2023). Afghanistan–Pakistan relations and the Durand line dilemma (Technical Report). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org
Hopf, T. (2013). Reconstructing the Cold War: The early years, 1945–1958. Oxford University Press.
Human Rights Watch. (2024). Afghanistan and Pakistan: Civilian costs of border violence (HRW Report).
International Crisis Group. (2024a). Pakistan–Afghanistan: The return of the border crisis (ICG Report No. 336).
International Crisis Group. (2024b, January 30). The Taliban’s neighbourhood: Regional diplomacy with the new Afghan administration. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/afghanistan/337-talibans-neighbourhood-regional-diplomacy-afghanistan
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. (2025). Official statement on Pakistan border incidents.
Kfir, I. (2023). Blurred sovereignty and militant sanctuaries: Cross-border insecurity in South Asia. Asian Security Studies, 19(3), 201–223.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Alfred A. Knopf.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Rashid, A. (2022). Pakistan’s troubled frontier: Militancy and state policy in the borderlands. Oxford University Press.
Rashid, A. (2024). Pakistan and the Taliban: A fractured relationship (Technical Report). Brookings Institution.
ResearchGate. (2025, September 2). Prospects for resolving the "Durand Line" problem.
Reuters. (2025a, October 16). Afghanistan condemns Pakistan airstrikes as breach of sovereignty. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/afghanistan-condemns-pakistan-airstrikes-2025-10-16
Reuters. (2025b, October 13). China is very concerned about Pakistan–Afghanistan clashes, foreign ministry says. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-is-very-concerned-about-pakistan-afghanistan-clashes-foreign-ministry-says-2025-10-13
Reuters. (2025c, October 12). Pakistan closes border with Afghanistan following exchanges of fire. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/pakistan-closes-border-with-afghanistan-following-exchanges-fire-2025-10-12
Salih, M. H. B., Kunwal, F., & Aziz, M. T. (2025). Framing of the Pakistan–Afghanistan border conflict in Pakistani media: A critical discourse analysis. SCRR Journal. https://www.scrrjournal.com/index.php/14/article/view/437
Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting qualitative data (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Tolo News. (2025, October 13). Afghanistan accuses Pakistan of border shelling near Spin Boldak. https://tolonews.com/afghanistan/pakistan-border-shelling-2025
United States Institute of Peace. (2024). Final report: Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan (Technical Report). https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/ssg-final-report-counterterrorism-afghanistan-pakistan.pdf
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yousaf, K. (2025). TTP’s cross-border strategy and Pakistan’s security policy. Journal of South Asian Studies, 40(2), 55–73.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY
