An Eco-linguistic Analysis of Urban Landscape and Social Critique in James Joyce's Dubliners

Authors

  • Muhammad Ajmal Associate Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Shaikh Ayaz University Shikarpur, Pakistan
  • Safia Siddiqui Assistant Professor, Department of English Literature, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Amber Hafeez Incharge, Department of English, Mohi-ud-din Islamic University, Nerian Sharif AJ & K

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v12i3.1955

Abstract

 

The main objective of this research is to revisit Stibbe (2015) framework of Eco-linguistics where he believes that it analyses language to reveal the stories we live by, judges those stories from an ecological perspective, resists damaging stories and contributes to the search for new stories to live by. This study examines James Joyce's Dubliners through an eco-linguistic perspective, focusing on the interplay between language, environment, and social critique. The detailed descriptions of Dublin's urban landscape and ecological symbols reflect the characters' inner lives and critique early 20th-century social conditions. The analysis draws on theoretical contributions from eco -linguistics and environmental criticism, emphasizing the use of linguistic landscapes and ecological metaphors to convey themes of stagnation, aspiration, and interconnectedness. By immersing the reader in the physical and social environments of Dublin, Joyce's language deepens empathy for the characters and enhances understanding of broader socio-environmental issues.

References

Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh University Press.

Berry, T. (1988). The dream of the earth. Sierra Club Books.

Bozóki, A., & Ishiyama, J. T. (2020). Introduction and theoretical framework. In The communist successor parties of central and eastern Europe (pp. 3–13). Routledge.

Buell, L. (1995). The environmental imagination: Thoreau, nature writing, and the formation of American culture. Harvard University Press.

Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin.

Endres, D. (2020). Environmental criticism. Western Journal of Communication, 84(3), 314–331.

Forte, D. L. (2024). Latin American ecolinguistics: Deconstructing discourse studies, coloniality and industrial environmentalism. Journal of World Languages, 10(2), 330–349.

Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton University Press.

Garrard, G. (2004). Eco-criticism. Routledge.

Garrard, G. (2012). Ecocriticism (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2001). New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The eco-linguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment (pp. 175–202). Continuum.

Joyce, J. (2006). Dubliners. Dover Publications. (Original work published 1914)

Karmakar, S. (2020). Eco-linguistics: The integrity and diversity of language systems. Jadavpur Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 4(1), 58–69.

Kingsnorth, P., & Hine, D. (2009). The Dark Mountain Project manifesto. Retrieved from http://dark-mountain.net/about/manifesto/

Korten, D. (2006). The great turning: From empire to Earth community. Berrett-Koehler.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Sage.

Meeker, J. W. (1972). The comedy of survival: Studies in literary ecology. Scribner.

Okri, B. (1996). Birds of heaven. Phoenix.

Papa, S. (2021). Eco-linguistic kinetics and decolonising industrial landscapes in Sherwin Bitsui’s poetry. Textes et contextes, 16(1).

Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.

Rueckert, W. (1978). Literature and ecology: An experiment in eco-criticism. Iowa Review, 9(1), 71–86.

Sharma, M. (2024). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) of ecological refugees in The Great Derangement; Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Climate Change and the Unthinkable, January 2, 2024.

Stibbe, A. (2015). Eco-linguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

Tollervey, M. J., Bekaert, M., González, A. B., Agha, S., Houston, R. D., Doeschl-Wilson, A., ... & Gutierrez, A. P. (2024). Assessing genotype–environment interactions in Atlantic salmon reared in freshwater loch and recirculating systems. Evolutionary Applications, 17(8), e13751.

Varpio, L., Paradis, E., Uijtdehaage, S., & Young, M. (2020). The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 989–994.

Williams, R. (1973). The country and the city. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Ajmal, M., Siddiqui, S., & Hafeez, A. (2024). An Eco-linguistic Analysis of Urban Landscape and Social Critique in James Joyce’s Dubliners. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 12(3), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v12i3.1955