Deconstructing Class Struggle and Gender Oppression: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of Jamal Abro's Pirani and Naseem Kharal's Thirty-Four Gates through Barthes' Five Codes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v12i3.1950Abstract
This study applies post-structuralist theory to analyze Jamal Abro’s Pirani and Naseem Kharal’s Thirty-Four Gates, focusing on how both stories portray class struggle and gender oppression within Sindhi society. Using Roland Barthes' five codes—hermeneutic, proairetic, semantic, symbolic, and cultural—the research uncovers multiple layers of meaning, interpreting the symbols, tensions, and ambiguities that reflect the socio-political realities of a male-dominated, feudal, and capitalist system. By employing a qualitative textual analysis, this research explores how Barthes' codes allow for the deconstruction of dominant narratives, revealing the complexities of class exploitation and cultural repression. The findings suggest that both authors critically condemn anti-women traditions and expose the systematic subjugation of women, who are rendered voiceless in a patriarchal society. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of Sindhi literature, translated into English and published by Oxford University Press, by engaging with the socio-political and cultural discourses embedded in the texts.
References
Akdemir, N. (2021). Deconstruction of gender stereotypes through fashion. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 8(2), 10–17.
Amoussou, F., & Dijmet, I. (2020). De-structuring social orders for social change: A feminist critical discourse analysis of excerpts from two contemporary literary artifacts. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 30–38.
Barry, P. (2002). Beginning theory: An introduction to literary and cultural theory. Manchester University Press.
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z (R. Miller, Trans.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Bertens, H. (2003). Literary theory: The basics. Routledge; Taylor Francis Group.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of capital (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. In A. Durante (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 369–394). Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996522.ch16
Campbell, A. (1994). Language death. Oxford University Press.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. John Wiley and Sons.
Child, A. (1941). The problem of imputation in the sociology of knowledge. Ethics, 51, 200–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/290210
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. S. Chakarvort, Ed.). John Hopkins University Press.
Derrida, J. (1979). Living on border lines. In H. B. et al. (Eds.), Deconstruction and criticism (pp. 83–84). Seabury Press.
Erete, S., Rankin, Y., & Thomas, J. (2023). A method to the madness: Applying an intersectional analysis of structural oppression and power in HCI and design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(2), 1–45.
Fontana, B. (2002). Hegemony and rhetoric political education in Gramsci.
Foucault, M. (1998). The history of sexuality: The will to knowledge. Penguin.
Hancock, P., & Tyler, M. (2001). Work, postmodernism and organization (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
Hoskin, R. A. (2020). “Femininity? It’s the aesthetic of subordination”: Examining femmephobia, the gender binary, and experiences of oppression among sexual and gender minorities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2319–2339.
Litowitz, D. (2000). Gramsci, hegemony and the law. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2000(2), 515.
Nigar, N. (2020). Hermeneutic phenomenological narrative enquiry: A qualitative study design. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(1), 10–18.
Rehman, T. (2002). Language-teaching and power in Pakistan.
Torras, M.-C., & Gafaranga, J. (2002). Social identities and language alternation in non-formal institutional bilingual talk: Trilingual service encounters in Barcelona. Language in Society, 31(4), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404502314027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404502314027
Vaccarini, M., Spegni, F., Giretti, A., Pirani, M., Carbonari, A., et al. (2024). Interoperable mixed reality for facility management: A cyber-physical perspective. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 29, 573–595.
Vincent, L. B. (1983). Extension of subversion. In Deconstructive criticism: An advance introduction. Columbia University Press.
Virkler, H. A., & Ayayo, K. G. (2023). Hermeneutics: Principles and processes of biblical interpretation. Baker Books.
Wacquant, L. (2002). Scrutinizing the street: Poverty, morality, and the pitfalls of urban ethnography. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1468–1532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/340461
Wong, M. T. (2021). Values, meanings, hermeneutics and mental health. In International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice: Case Studies and Commentaries (pp. 341–349).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY
