Impact of Technology on Student Learning Outcomes: Teachers’ Perspectives

Authors

  • Dr. Muhammad Javed Aftab Department of Special Education, Division of Education (DoE), University of Education, Township, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Dr. Hina Hadayat Ali Department of1Special Education, Division of Education (DoE), University of Education, Township, Lahore (Faisalabad Campus), Punjab, Pakistan
  • Navid Ur Rehman Department of Special Education, Government of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab(Pakistan)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v11i2.1599

Abstract

In the ever-evolving realm of education, the incorporation of technology stands out as a transformative influence, holding the potential to redefine conventional teaching methods and elevate student learning achievements. This research probes the perspectives of educators within the Pakistani context, delving into the effects of technology on student learning outcomes and the hurdles encountered in its assimilation. Employing a quantitative research framework, the study scrutinized data from 320 teachers affiliated with the Punjab education department. The results showcase a shared viewpoint among educators, affirming the favorable impact of technology on student involvement, comprehension, motivation, and critical thinking abilities. Notwithstanding the optimistic viewpoints, obstacles such as limited access to resources and a reluctance to embrace change were pinpointed. Analyses of demographic data additionally unveiled disparities in perceptions linked to variables such as posting location, age, qualifications, and experience. These findings offer valuable input for crafting suggestions, including the implementation of extensive professional development initiatives, investments in infrastructure, customized assistance for distinct challenges, and the formulation of research-backed policies. Attending to these recommendations holds the potential to optimize the advantages of technology in education, ultimately bolstering student learning outcomes.

References

Ahn, S., & Park, I. (2021). Examining teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for mobile learning implementation in English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 126-140

Buckingham, D., & Domaille, K. (2009). The creative ecology of YouTube. In P. Bräuchler & J. Postill (Eds.), Theorising media and practice (pp. 39–55). Berghahn Books.

Davis, N., & Shade, D. (2015). Digital storytelling: The rise of user-generated content. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(3-4), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753014561806

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-015-0032-5

Ertmer, P. A., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2020). Teacher professional development in the age of digital technologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 103102.

Ertmer, P. A., & Bailey, T. D. (2022). Teacher professional development and instructional design for technology-enabled learning. In Handbook of educational technologies (pp. 447-469). Springer, Singapore.

Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Cheng, B. H., Sabelli, N., Organisciak, P., & Sherin, M. G. (2013). Design-Based Implementation Research: An Emerging Model for Transforming the Relationship of Research and Practice. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 112(2), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744- 7984.2013.12002.x

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What Works in Professional Development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000710

Hämäläinen, R., & Vesisenaho, M. (2018). Collaborative technology-mediated inquiry in elementary science: What it is and how it influences students’ discourses. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 17, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.001

Hixon, E., Buckenmeyer, J., & Crane, C. (2015). Scaling Professional Development in Online Learning: A Case Study of Technology Integration in a Rural High School. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(4), 501–516.

Johnson, L., & Smith, R. S. (2016). How Planning and Technology Can Marry to Improve Learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/6/how-planning-and-technology-can-marry-to-improve-learning

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2018). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2018 K–12 Edition. The New Media Consortium. https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2018/3/2018ncmk12edition.pdf

Jones, D., & Schaffhauser, D. (2020). 2020 Digital Campus Report. Campus Technology. https://campustechnology.com/Articles/2020/11/18/2020-Digital-Campus-Report.aspx

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Moerschbach, M., & Smith, D. C. (2022). Teacher perceptions of professional development for technology integration: Understanding the complex interplay of factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), 396-419

Pajares, F. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Information Age Publishing.

Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Retrieved from [source]

Smith, A. N., & Clark, A. (2017). Are Interactive Whiteboards a Necessary Instructional Tool? A Mixed-Methods Investigation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 17–27.

Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design. ASCD.

Voogt, J., & Dede, C. (2021). Professional development for technology integration in education: Towards a framework for critical reflection and continuous improvement. Educational Design Research, 17(8), 1-12.

Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2011). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 113(6), 1283–1302. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=16390

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Dr. Muhammad Javed Aftab, Dr. Hina Hadayat Ali, & Navid Ur Rehman. (2023). Impact of Technology on Student Learning Outcomes: Teachers’ Perspectives . VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 11(2), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v11i2.1599

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): April-June

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

                                      

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution  License CC BY