Attack on Malala: Framing of the Incident in the Print Media

Authors

  • Syed Hassan Raza Universiti Utara Malaysia Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan
  • Waqar Khan Kaharal Communication Studies Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan. Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ahsan Bhatti Communication Studies Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan. Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v12i1.428

Abstract

Analysis of the media coverage on the attack incidence on Malala (Nobel peace prize winner) benefits to comprehend the notions that how media outline the opinions and viewpoints. Media outlets play a dynamic role on how the people perceives several issues highlighted in the news. The media organizes the varied framing of realism of issues of the public interest and vice versa. The study objectives to find out that how the leading print media in Pakistan have covered Malala issue and classify the variances amongst the two leading newspapers based on several categories. Two Urdu newspapers (Jang and Nawa-e-Waqt) of Pakistan were selected for this study based on their high circulation and trustworthiness amongst the readers. The print newspapers published in the months of October and November 2012 were examined to find the framing of Malala issue. The study reveals that the favorable (56%), unfavorable (16%) and neutral (27%) frames found in the newspaper Jang and favorable (46%), unfavorable (47%) and neutral (7%) found in Nawa-e-Waqt. It is also observed that favorable Malala issue related news stories were disseminated more in Jang.

References

REFERENCE

. Lewis, J., Williams, A., & Franklin, B. (2008). A Compromised Fourth Estate. Journalism Studies, 9(1), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701767974

. Newman, N., Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2012). Social Media in the Changing Ecology of News : The Fourth and Fifth Estates in Britain. International Journal of Internet Science, 7(1), 6–22.

. Freyenberger, D. (2013). Amanda Knox : A Content Analysis of Media Framing in Newspapers Around the World, 1–46. Retrieved from http://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi, article=2281&context=etd

. Maclennan, B., Kypri, K., Room, R., & Langley, J. (2013). Local government alcohol policy development: Case studies in three New Zealand communities. Addiction, 108(5), 885–895. http://doi.org/10.1111/add.12017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12017

. Raza, S. H., & Awan, S. M. (2013). Discourse Analysis of Coverage Regarding Drone Attacks: A study of Pakistani Print Media. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 33(2), 379-388.

. Bohensky, E. L., & Leitch, A. M. (2014). Framing the flood: A media analysis of themes of resilience in the 2011 Brisbane flood. Regional Environmental Change, 14(2), 475–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0438-2

. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054

. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication. 57(1), 9-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x

. Douai, A., & Lauricella, S. (2014). The “terrorism” frame in “neo-Orientalism”: Western news and the Sunni–Shia Muslim sectarian relations after 9/11. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 10(1), 7–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.10.1.7_1

. Cohen-Almagor, R. (2001). Speech , Media and Ethics The Limits of Free Expression. Ethics, 216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501829

. Giles, D. (2003). Media Psychology. Media Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607263

. Mulder, a. (2006). Media. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 289–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406062683

. Johnson, N. A., Cooper, R. B., & Chin, W. W. (2009). Anger and flaming in computer-mediated negotiation among strangers. Decision Support Systems, 46(3), 660–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.10.008

. Plaisier, X. S., & Konijn, E. a. (2012). Rejected by Peers—Attracted to Antisocial Media Content: Rejection-Based Anger Impairs Moral Judgment Among Adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1165–1173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029399

. Ashish Thomas, E., & Narain Shukul, R. (2015). Framing of Malala Yousafzai: a comparative analysis of news coverage in Western and Pakistani mainstream English print and alternative media. Media Asia, 42(3–4), 225–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2016.1142248

. Bailey, G. (2014). The power of Malala. International Social Work, 57(1), 75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872813511910

. Tolentino, E. P., Uhl, J. O., & Ahmad, I. (2015). The Nobel Peace Prize: Malala, A Girl Determined to Go to School. Social Education, 79(1), 18–21

. Scherer, Ma. (2013). Maya and Malala. Educational Leadership, 71(1), 7.

. Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x

. de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and Typology. Information Design Journal of Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre

. Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2008). Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4), 555–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.07-034-R2

. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Krippendorff / Reliability In Content Analysis 411 Reliability in Content Analysis Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/30.3.411

Downloads

Published

2017-02-12

How to Cite

Raza, S. H., Kaharal, W. K., & Bhatti, M. A. (2017). Attack on Malala: Framing of the Incident in the Print Media. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v12i1.428