Automated Fetal Femur Segmentation and Length Measurement in Ultrasound Images: A Key Tool for Accurate Gestational Age Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21015/vtcs.v13i1.2101Abstract
Accurate gestational age (GA) estimation in the second and third trimesters is crucial for effective prenatal care. It is typically determined by measuring fetal femur length (FL) in ultrasound (US) images. However, manual FL measurements are time-consuming and require expertise, leading to the need for automation. This study aims to develop an automated multi-step approach to improve FL measurement accuracy while addressing common US challenges such as speckle noise, shadows, and low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The proposed method includes image acquisition, preprocessing for contrast enhancement, speckle noise reduction using a bilateral filter, k-means clustering for initial femur segmentation, and morphological analysis to isolate the femur for precise FL measurement. The approach achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 93.18±9.54% and a mean measurement difference of 0.062 cm compared to manual assessments, with 95% limits of agreement from -1.06 cm to 1.19 cm, confirming its accuracy and clinical reliability. These results demonstrate that the proposed method enhances FL measurement accuracy, reduces manual workload, and contributes to more reliable GA estimation, making it a valuable tool for prenatal care.
References
F. Recker, U. Gembruch, and B. Strizek, “Clinical ultrasound applications in obstetrics and gynecology in the year 2024,” 2024, p. 1244.
Y. E. E. Salama, A. E.-M. M. Zakaria, and Y. M. S. K. Diab, “Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of lateral and posterior invasion in patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorders,” Al-Azhar International Medical Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 20, 2023.
T. Tzatzairis, K. Skarentzos, C. Grammatikos, C. Karamalis, K. Korakianitis, R. Kourempeles, and G. Drosos, “Ultrasound applications in pediatric orthopedics,” Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 457, 2024.
M. H. Rahman, M. S. Hossain, and F. Islam, “Design and implementation of speckle noise reduction algorithm using 2D ultrasound image,” International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, vol. 3, pp. 31–47, 2023.
S. Rueda, S. Fathima, C. L. Knight, M. Yaqub, A. T. Papageorghiou, B. Rahmatullah, A. Foi, M. Maggioni, A. Pepe, J. Tohka et al., “Evaluation and comparison of current fetal ultrasound image segmentation methods for biometric measurements: a grand challenge,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 797–813, 2013.
J. Agbenyah, D. Sule, W. K. Antwi, V. Hewlett, K. Asare-Dompreh, and E. T. Matey, “Exploring the relationship between placenta thickness, gestational age and fetal weight, a community study in Ghana,” Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 364–373, 2024.
M. M. Gebreel, M. F. Mohamed, and S. A. H. A. Fattah, “A comparative study of the transverse cerebellar diameter of the fetus with the biparietal diameter and femur length in estimation of diagnostic accuracy of gestational age in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy,” Al-Azhar International Medical Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 10, 2024.
A. Shafique, Z. Suhail, and H. M. Danish, “Hybrid technique for estimating fetal head circumference using ultrasound imaging,” International Journal of Innovations in Science and Technology, vol. 6, pp. 1058–1075, 2024.
Y. Zeng, P.-H. Tsui, W. Wu, Z. Zhou, and S. Wu, “Fetal ultrasound image segmentation for automatic head circumference biometry using deeply supervised attention-gated V-Net,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 34, pp. 134–148, 2021.
A. Grimwood, K. Thomas, S. Kember, G. Aldis, R. Lawes, B. Brigden, J. Francis, E. Henegan, M. Kerner, L. Delacroix et al., “Factors affecting accuracy and precision in ultrasound guided radiotherapy,” Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology, vol. 18, pp. 68–77, 2021.
H. M. Danish, Z. Suhail, and F. Farooq, “Deep learning-based automation for segmentation and biometric measurement of the gestational sac in ultrasound images,” Frontiers in Pediatrics, vol. 12, p. 1453302, 2024.
G. V. Ponomarev, M. S. Gelfand, and M. D. Kazanov, “A multilevel thresholding combined with edge detection and shape-based recognition for segmentation of fetal ultrasound images,” in Proc. Challenge US: Biometric Measurements from Fetal Ultrasound Images, ISBI, vol. 2012, pp. 17–19, 2012.
F. Zhu, M. Liu, F. Wang, D. Qiu, R. Li, and C. Dai, “Automatic measurement of fetal femur length in ultrasound images: A comparison of random forest regression model and SegNet,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 7790–7805, 2021.
J. A. Noble and D. Boukerroui, “Ultrasound image segmentation: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 987–1010, 2006.
K. M. Meiburger, U. R. Acharya, and F. Molinari, “Automated localization and segmentation techniques for B-mode ultrasound images: A review,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 92, pp. 210–235, 2018.
C.-W. Wang, H.-C. Chen, C.-W. Peng, and C.-M. Hung, “Automatic femur segmentation and length measurement from fetal ultrasound images,” in Proc. Challenge US: Biometric Measurements from Fetal Ultrasound Images, ISBI, pp. 21–23, 2012.
F. Hermawati, H. Tjandrasa, G. P. Sari, A. Azis et al., “Automatic femur length measurement for fetal ultrasound image using localizing region-based active contour method,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1230, no. 1, p. 012002, 2019.
J. G. Thomas, R. A. Peters, and P. Jeanty, “Automatic segmentation of ultrasound images using morphological operators,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 180–186, 1991.
R. Ruhela, B. Gupta, and S. Singh Lamba, “An efficient approach for texture smoothing by adaptive joint bilateral filtering,” The Visual Computer, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 2035–2049, 2023.
A. M. Ikotun, A. E. Ezugwu, L. Abualigah, B. Abuhaija, and J. Heming, “K-means clustering algorithms: A comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the era of big data,” Information Sciences, vol. 622, pp. 178–210, 2023.
C.-W. Wang, “Automatic entropy-based femur segmentation and fast length measurement for fetal ultrasound images,” in Proc. 2014 Int. Conf. Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ARIS), IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–5.
M. Honarvar, M. Allahyari, and S. Dehbashi, “Assessment of gestational age based on ultrasonic femur length after the first trimester: a simple mathematical correlation between gestational age (GA) and femur length (FL),” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 335–340, 2000.
J. K. Udupa, V. R. LeBlanc, Y. Zhuge, C. Imielinska, H. Schmidt, L. M. Currie, B. E. Hirsch, and J. Woodburn, “A framework for evaluating image segmentation algorithms,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 75–87, 2006.
T. Heimann, B. Van Ginneken, M. A. Styner, Y. Arzhaeva, V. Aurich, C. Bauer, A. Beck, C. Becker, R. Beichel, G. Bekes et al., “Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1251–1265, 2009.
M. A. Mansournia, R. Waters, M. Nazemipour, M. Bland, and D. G. Altman, “Bland–Altman methods for comparing methods of measurement and response to criticisms,” Global Epidemiology, vol. 3, p. 100045, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY
