School Monitoring System in Punjab: Challenges Confronted By Internal Schools Monitors

Authors

  • Sajad Ahmad PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Faculty of Education, University of Education Lahore, Pakistan
  • Zahida Parveen Assistant Professor, Department of Special Education, Faculty of Education, University of Education Lahore, Pakistan
  • Farzana Yousaf Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Faculty of Education, University of Education Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v10i2.1058

Abstract

In Punjab (Pakistan), an internal school monitoring system is in practice along with an external monitoring system. Internal monitors faced some problems while doing school monitoring. This study aimed to identify the problems faced by internal school monitors and analyze the effects of monitors’ problems on their efficiency in monitoring the elementary schools. The study was delimited to the district Mianwali, which has three tehsils. A census sampling technique was used to select the study sample. A self-developed questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale was used as an instrument and finalized after validation through experts’ opinions to face and content validity. Data were collected from 99 Assistant Education Officers (AEOs), i.e., internal school monitors. The study found that a strong mechanism of school monitoring exists but is not properly organized, having some problems such as lack of power and authority of internal monitors, social interference in their work, and insufficient financial resources. The internal monitors cannot give proper attention to the school’s monitoring due to their socio-economic and professional problems. Their efficiency may be improved by solving these problems.

References

Ahmad, I., Said, H., Khan, F., Yassin, M. A. M., Tahir, L. M., Bukhari, S. K. U. S., & Ali, A. (2013). Barriers to Effective school inspection in Pakistan and Way Forward. World Applied Sciences Journal, 24(6), 814-821.

Bartle, P. (2010). Monitoring and Evaluation, How and How Well Objectives are Being Reached. www.scn.org/cmp/modules/mon-int.htm [Assessed on 26/09/2019].

Britan, G. (2010). Performance: Monitoring and Evaluation Tips Constructing Mixed Method Evaluations. USAID

Ehren, M. C., Leeuw, F. L., & Scheerens, J. (2005). On the impact of the Dutch Educational Supervision Act: analyzing assumptions concerning the inspection of primary education. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273182

Chawla, D., & Sodhi, N. (2011). Research methodology: Concepts and cases. Vikas Publishing House.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. 5th Ed. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342

Davis, Andrew & White, J. (2001). Accountability and School Inspection: In Defense of Audited Self- Review. Journal of Philosophy of education, 35(4), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00252

Ehren, M. & Adrie, V. (2006). Towards a Theory on the Impact of School Inspection. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(I), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00333.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00333.x

Etxeberria, F., Intxausti, N., & Azpillaga, V. (2017). School climate in highly effective schools in the autonomous region of the Basque Country (Spain). REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 15(4), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2017.15.4.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2017.15.4.001

Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Education. (2001). Education sector reforms: Action Plan 2001-2004. Islamabad: Ministry of Education (p.15).

Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Education. (2008). Education for all: Mid-decadeassessment (country report). Islamabad: Ministry of Education (p.11-15)

Government of Punjab (2007). Punjab in Figures 2007. Lahore: Planning and Development Department.

Grauwe, A. (2001). Supervision in four African countries. Challenges and Reforms. Paris:UNESCO.

Grauwe, A. (2008). School Monitoring system and the impact on disparity. Background paper prepared for the education for all. Global monitoring. Oxford. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Habib, K., (2002). National Diagnostic of Head Teachers in Pakistan, Imposing School Management in Asia. Academy of educational planning and management, Islamabad: Pakistan.

Haule, M. E. (2012). The perceptions of school teachers and leaders toward school inspections in Tanzania secondary schools: the case of Arusha Municipality (Master's thesis, University of Twente).

Kabati, J. (2017). The Effectiveness of School Inspectors in Assuring the Quality of Primary Education In Shinyanga District (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University of Tanzania).

Khawaja, S. (2001). Educational Evaluation and Monitoring Concepts and Techniques. Islamabad: Mr. Book, Super Market.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and Techniques (2nd edition) New Delhi: New Age International Ltd.

Kristensena, B. (2007). The Impact of Quality Monitoring on Institutions: a Danish experience at the Copenhagen Business School www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713443244 [Assessed on 28/09/2019].

Lupimo, F. M. (2014). The Role of School Inspection in Improving Academic Performance in Community Secondary Schools in Tanzania: A Case Study of Bariadi District. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation. Mzumbe University, Dar es Salaam.

Machumu, H. J. (2012). Secondary school teachers’ Attitude towards school inspection: A case of Bunda District Council in Tanzania. International Research Journal of Musicology and Drama (IRJMD), 1(1), 1-7.

Mahmood, Z. (2015). Comparative Effectiveness of Internal and External Monitoring Systems in Punjab Education Department (Doctoral dissertation, Hazara University Mansehra).

Mahmood, D. Z. (2017). Comparison of Internal and External Monitoring Systems in Term of Students’ Attendance, Enrollment and Retention in Punjab Education Department-Pakistan. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 7(8), 58-67.Mahmood, Z., Anwar, S., & Khan, S. (2012). Effectiveness of Program Monitoring and Implementation Unit (External Monitoring) in Controlling Teachers' Absenteeism in Punjab (Pakistan). Language in India, 12(2), 808-823.

Malhotra, N.K. & Birks, D.F. (2007) Marketing research: An applied approach: Pearson Education.

Matete, R. E. (2009). The impact of primary school inspection on teaching and learning in Tanzania: A study of Mbeya city district (Master's thesis).

Mathew, I. A. (2012). The challenges facing schools inspection Amid Universal Basic Education (UBE) implementation in Nigeria. International Journal of learning and Development, 2(5), 203-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v2i5.1986

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26458/1746

Neave, G. (1987). Accountability in education. In Economics of Education (pp. 70-79). Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-033379-3.50019-X

Newten, P. E. (2008). Monitoring National Attainment Standard. A Collection of Working Paper. www.ofqul.gov.uk. [Assessed on 25/09/2019]

Obiweluozor, N., Momoh, U., & Ogbonnaya, N. O. (2013). Supervision and inspection for effective primary education in Nigeria: Strategies for improvement. Academic Research International, 4(4), 586.

Onasanya, S. A. (2011). The Concept and practice of supervision/inspection in kwara State Public schools. University of Ilorin.

Richards, C. (2001). School Inspection: A Re‐appraisal. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(4), 655-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00251

Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. Wiley.

Saleem, S., & Naureen, S. (2017). A Study to Find out the Effectiveness of Monitoring System in Government Middle Schools, Chiltan Town, Quetta. Balochistan Review. XXXVIII(2).

Sergiovanni, T., & Starratt, R. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.

Shah, D. (2003). Decentralization in the education system of Pakistan: Policies and strategies. Paper presented in UNESCO Seminar on Decentralization Policies and Strategies in Education, Buenos Aires, Argentina (p.20-21).

Shah, D. (2009). Monitoring the Quality of Secondary Education in Context of Decentralization in Pakistan. Lahore: Bulletin of Education and Research, 31(1), 1-25.

Shami, P.A. & Hussain, K.S. (2006). Development of education in Pakistan. Islamabad. Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Ministry of Education (p.11-13 & 61)

U.N. (2010). Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programs. Online available at: www.unddr.org/index.php dated 23/09/2019 [Assessed on 23/09/2019].

UNEP (2010). Roadmap for Effective Performance Monitoring at a Lower Cost World Bank Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Neustar Inc. Online available at: www.worldbank.org/evaluation/ [Assessed on 23/09/2019].

UNESCO (2009). School Monitoring Systems and their Impact on DisparitiesOnline available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001800/180083e.pdf [Assessed on 23/09/2019].

URT, (2010). Secondary Education Development Programme II. UnpublishedWalliman, N. (2011). Research Methods: The Basics. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. London and New York.

Wilcox, B. (2000). Making School Inspection Visits More Effective: The English Experience.Paris UNESCO.

World Bank (2007). Monitoring and Evaluation Development Project- the South Asian Experience, Economic Development Institute. www.worldbank.org [Assessed on 23/09/2019].

Downloads

Published

2022-06-17

How to Cite

Ahmad, S., Parveen, Z., & Yousaf, F. (2022). School Monitoring System in Punjab: Challenges Confronted By Internal Schools Monitors. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 10(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v10i2.1058

Issue

Section

Articles